For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. ~Matthew 16:27

Lauren Kuby, Kari Jill Granville And David Schapira Posting Campaign Signs Illegally?

Posted: 2014-05-11

Peggy McClain 5-12-14

Back in April, Tempeans were reminded it is an election year once again.  The large campaign signs began appearing at many intersections.

There may be one problem:  Arizona Statute states these signs cannot be placed until 60 days before the election.  The primary is August 26th.

Why are these signs up?  I'm sure Lauren Kuby is anxious to win a seat on Tempe Council so she can further advance Tempe's Agenda 21, thus allowing her to keep her important job at ASU's Institute of Sustainability.  Bye-bye to more of our tax dollars.

Kari Jill Granville is a lawyer running for Justice of the Peace in the University Lakes division.  Are her signs in compliance with the law since it's only May?  Should Tempe elect a candidate to oversee minor legal issues who isn't following the law herself?

It seems David Schapira , Tempe Council candidate and professional politician, also doesn't have to abide by the 60-day rule.  These signs were posted at Rural and Guadalupe today.

One would think a perpetual candidate would know the statutes.  Another big government do as I say not as I do politician.


 

2011 Arizona Revised Statutes
Title 16 Elections and Electors
16-1019 Political signs; printed materials; tampering; classification

 

16-1019. Political signs; printed materials; tampering; classification

A. It is a class 2 misdemeanor for any person to knowingly remove, alter, deface or cover any political sign of any candidate for public office or knowingly remove, alter or deface any political mailers, handouts, flyers or other printed materials of a candidate that are delivered by hand to a residence for the period commencing forty-five days before a primary election and ending seven days after the general election.

B. This section does not apply to the removal, alteration, defacing or covering of a political sign or other printed materials by the candidate or the authorized agent of the candidate in support of whose election the sign was placed, by the owner or authorized agent of the owner of private property on which such signs are placed with or without permission of the owner or placed in violation of state law or county, city or town ordinance or regulation.

C. Notwithstanding any other statute, ordinance or regulation, a city, town or county of this state shall not remove, alter, deface or cover any political sign if the following conditions are met:

1. The sign is placed in a public right-of-way that is owned or controlled by that jurisdiction.

2. The sign supports or opposes a candidate for public office or it supports or opposes a ballot measure.

3. The sign is not placed in a location that is hazardous to public safety, obstructs clear vision in the area or interferes with the requirements of the Americans with disabilities act (42 United States Code sections 12101 through 12213 and 47 United States Code sections 225 and 611).

4. The sign has a maximum area of sixteen square feet, if the sign is located in an area zoned for residential use, or a maximum area of thirty-two square feet if the sign is located in any other area.

5. The sign contains the name and telephone number of the candidate or campaign committee contact person.

D. If the city, town or county deems that the placement of a political sign constitutes an emergency, the jurisdiction may immediately relocate the sign. The jurisdiction shall notify the candidate or campaign committee that placed the sign within twenty-four hours after the relocation. If a sign is placed in violation of subsection C and the placement is not deemed to constitute an emergency, the city, town or county may notify the candidate or campaign committee that placed the sign of the violation. If the sign remains in violation at least twenty-four hours after the jurisdiction notified the candidate or campaign committee, the jurisdiction may remove the sign. The jurisdiction shall contact the candidate or campaign committee contact and shall retain the sign for at least ten business days to allow the candidate or campaign committee to retrieve the sign without penalty.

E. A city, town or county employee acting within the scope of the employee's employment is not liable for an injury caused by the failure to remove a sign pursuant to subsection D unless the employee intended to cause injury or was grossly negligent.

F. Subsection C does not apply to commercial tourism, commercial resort and hotel sign free zones as those zones are designated by municipalities. The total area of those zones shall not be larger than three square miles, and each zone shall be identified as a specific contiguous area where, by resolution of the municipal governing body, the municipality has determined that based on a predominance of commercial tourism, resort and hotel uses within the zone the placement of political signs within the rights-of-way in the zone will detract from the scenic and aesthetic appeal of the area within the zone and deter its appeal to tourists. Not more than two zones may be identified within a municipality.

G. A city, town or county may prohibit the installation of a sign on any structure owned by the jurisdiction.

H. Subsection C applies only during the period commencing sixty days before a primary election and ending fifteen days after the general election, except that for a sign for a candidate in a primary election who does not advance to the general election, the period ends fifteen days after the primary election.

I. This section does not apply to state highways or routes, or overpasses over those state highways or routes.


Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Arizona may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.


Share this article on:    Facebook     Google+     Twitter

 

Enter comments below:

Your Email:
Validation Code from Graphic:
Enter these characters in the field above.


(Comments subject to review before being published.)


Previous Comments


From: wildcatswin@cox.net Posted on: 2014-05-14

Early sign installation seemed to be an issue last year:

http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/20130614phoenix-campaign-sign-violations.html

Perhaps it depends on whether a municipality wants to use its resources tracking and/or removing the early signage.  I would think if it were okay, more candidates would already have erected their signs at intersections.


From: 5678@fake.com Posted on: 2014-05-14

The previous commentors obviously has never had to deal with a city on these signs before. Yes the clause is protective. Yes the signs are not "illegal" in the sense that they can be fined or charged with anything. But these ugly chunks of plastic mark up our city and they still cost the city time and resources when a complaint is filed. Prior to the 60 days, the city can and often will take them down if they are in the right of way, but only once a complaint is filed.


From: ilovelivingintempe@gmail.com Posted on: 2014-05-14

Did you happen to read Subsection C after highlighting H? It makes it very clear that this is a protective statute. The state is stopping cities from taking signs down during that time period (within 60 days). Nothing in the statute says that candidates can't put signs up outside that time. Maybe you should read things a little more thoroughly before posting something like this or check with a lawyer if you can't understand it yourself.


From: 1234@fake.com Posted on: 2014-05-14

You don't know how to read statute. This section does not restrict placing signs to 60-days before the primary election, rather it simply prohibits a city, county, or town from removing a sign within 60-days of the election. 

Nice try, though. 

 

Elections Article Summary
Replies
PostedArticle TitleTotalPending
2019-05-29 JEXIT: Jews Are Leaving The Anti-Semitic Dem... 0 0
2019-04-16 Year 1988: Bernie Sanders and Abbie Hoffman ... 0 0
2019-04-16 Chicago Marxists are Pulling the Strings on ... 0 0
2018-12-02 A Taxing Issue 0 0
2018-10-18 Arizona Prop 126 0 0
2018-10-18 The Devastating Potential Impact Of Hurrican... 0 0
2018-08-12 Campaign Promises Kept By President Trump: G... 0 0
2018-08-12 Glenn Beck Pledges To Vote For Trump in 2020... 0 0
2017-07-19 Who Is Organizing For Action? 0 0
2017-06-09 James Comey Hearing Shocker! President Trump... 0 0
2017-04-24 Scuffles erupt in Paris after presidential p... 0 0
2017-04-24 BREAKING! RIOTS ERUPT IN FRANCE AFTER ELECTI... 0 0
2017-04-24 Democrats no longer have a choice about bein... 0 0
2017-03-16 The Untruth About Steve Bannon | Donald Trum... 0 0
2017-02-16 Here's the Full List of Donald Trump's Execu... 0 0
2017-01-27 Whitehouse Press Conference 1-23-17: Trump T... 0 0
2017-01-24 Gigapixel Of Inauguration 0 0
2017-01-23 America Under Siege: Civil War 2017 0 0
2017-01-22 Intellectual Froglegs: Evolution of a Revolu... 0 0
2017-01-22 Press Secretary Sean Spicer Slams Media - Wh... 0 0
2017-01-19 Donald Trump's first press conference as pre... 0 0
2017-01-19 Buzzfeed Publishes Shocking Fake News About ... 0 0
2016-10-27 Michael Moore Talking Out Of Both Sides Of H... 0 0
2016-10-26 Michael Moore Endorses Donald Trump? 0 0
2016-10-23 Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Camp... 0 0
2016-09-24 Never McCain 0 0
2016-08-17 Hillary's Socialist Utopia Now Being Played ... 0 0
2016-07-19 Senators NOT going to the GOP Convention 0 0
2016-07-19 Is Hillary Guilty? 0 0
2016-07-16 The Clinton's Dead Friends 0 0
2016-07-10 HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN IS IN FULL SWING 0 0
2016-07-08 Dallas Police Assassinated: Death By Electio... 0 0
2016-07-05 New Phoenix Property Tax Increase Passes By ... 0 0
2016-07-01 "The Peasants are Revolting" Intellectual Fr... 0 0
2016-07-01 Saturday July 2, 2016: Itasca Small on "A Ca... 0 0
2016-06-22 Times Are Changing in Gilbert By Gary Livac... 0 0
2016-06-22 To Hillary in a Handbasket" Intellectual Fro... 0 0
2016-06-10 Bernie's Bros Spread The Love 0 0
2016-04-11 Princeton University Exposes Diebold Flaws 0 0
2016-04-04 G. Edward Griffin: Donald Trump is an Amazin... 0 0
2016-03-22 BREAKING: Head Anti-Trump Protester's BOMBSH... 0 0
2016-03-07 Voter Fraud - Just a snap away! 0 0
2016-02-29 Trump and the Rise of the Unprotected 0 0
2016-01-18 Natural born citizen status is inherited - i... 0 0
2016-01-07 "There's a New Sheriff in Town" Intellectual... 0 0
2015-12-27 What If Trump Had A British Accent? 0 0
2015-12-10 Arizona Sen. Carlyle Begay: "We Must See Our... 0 0
2015-12-10 The Impact of Coal Restrictions on the Navaj... 0 0
2015-12-07 Roger Stone explains the 'Trumpnado' sweepin... 0 0
2015-11-28 HEADS UP ALL MESA ACTIVISTS. LOOK WHAT YOUR ... 0 0
The Latest


The Latest (cont.)


If you would like to get the latest news from EVNN,
just send an email to eastvalleynewsnetwork@gmail.com
and say "Sign me up" and you will receive
our daily news digest at your inbox.

national debt

 

 
Catching the News that others let get away...
 
- Sitemap -